End of service benefits valuation in Saudi Arabia under IAS 19, in SAR, signed off by FSA actuaries.
Prima Consulting prepares IAS 19 and actuarial work for insurers, banks and other regulated businesses.
An end of service benefits valuation in Saudi Arabia is the actuarial estimate of the amount a company will pay employees on exit, discounted to today under IAS 19. It is not the same as the award calculated under the Saudi Labor Law, which sets a payment on exit. Entities reporting under IFRS as endorsed in the Kingdom need the first figure in their financial statements.
SOCPA, the Saudi Organization for Chartered and Professional Accountants, endorses the IFRS Standards used in the Kingdom. Publicly accountable entities must apply them, while smaller companies apply the IFRS for SMEs Standard as endorsed unless they elect full IFRS (IFRS Foundation jurisdiction profile for Saudi Arabia).
From there the auditor asks for independent actuarial support, the SAR reporting date holds, and the internal workbook stops counting as evidence. For a plain-language view of the standard, read our IAS 19 overview with worked examples.
IAS 19 treats an end of service benefit as a defined benefit obligation, so the figure comes from an actuarial model and not from a payroll formula. The model uses the projected unit credit method in a worked example, projects salary growth, turnover and mortality to each exit date, and discounts the payments to the reporting date. Changes in the obligation then move through profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
The Saudi Labor Law award supplies the benefit rule that goes into the model. Article 84 sets it at half a month’s wage for each of the first five years and a full month’s wage for each year after, based on the last wage (official English translation of the Labor Law). It is an input, not the answer.
Booking the statutory figure alone invites audit adjustments and restated comparatives. Review the recurring errors in IAS 19 valuations before your next close. A signed actuarial report gives your auditor a measurement to test.
And the work itself is quick once the employee data is clean.
The need: a valuation from a credentialed outside actuary, finished before the review closes.
Prima's answer: a scoped assignment with a fixed turnaround, led by an actuary with the FSA credential.
The need: one assumption framework across every group company.
Prima's answer: a shared methodology and report template for all Saudi entities in a single assignment.
The need: finished notes for the financial statements.
Prima's answer: the report carries draft notes for the DBO roll-forward, OCI remeasurements and sensitivity analysis. Each input is set from the factors behind each valuation assumption, not from last year's carried-forward figures.
The need: a rate matched to the obligation's currency that survives challenge.
Prima's answer: a documented basis, using corporate or government bond yields according to what the market data supports, with sensitivity attached. The reasoning is set out in our guide to how the IAS 19 discount rate is chosen.
The need: continuity and a written trail for the auditor.
Prima's answer: a firm-level appointment where a second actuary reviews every file, models are version-controlled and the account has more than one credentialed actuary.
The need: a quick, supportable estimate of what the target owes its staff.
Prima's answer: valuations scoped to the deal, covering diligence and purchase accounting, then plan integration advice on post-deal benefit harmonization.
Track A: Full End of Service Valuation
| Deliverable | Effect on Your Reporting |
|---|---|
| Projected unit credit valuation | The obligation follows the measurement basis IAS 19 prescribes, so your auditor can test the figure. |
| Assumptions with sensitivity ranges | Discount rate, pay growth, staff turnover and mortality are stress-tested and written down, which shortens query rounds. |
| Draft disclosure notes | Notes arrive written, so your team does not format them at close. |
| Calculation engine | Prima's in-house EOSB calculation software runs and checks the computation, which cuts manual error. |
| Actuary sign-off with auditor access | An actuary signs the report and takes auditor questions first-hand. |
Track B: Valuation Review and Auditor Support
| Deliverable | Effect on Your Reporting |
|---|---|
| Independent check of your current valuation | A second actuary's view reaches you before the audit team sees the file, through our independent review before the audit. |
| Compliance gap check | Your current provision is tested line by line against IAS 19, with a ranked list of fixes. |
| Audit query support | Prepared documents and direct actuary replies during fieldwork keep the audit on schedule. |
| Experience studies | Your own turnover and salary history is analysed so next year's assumptions rest on evidence. |
| Step 1: Scope and Quote |
One call fixes the entities, benefit types and reporting date. | OUTPUT: Written scope letter with a firm timetable. |
| >>> | ||
| Step 2: Data Collection |
You send the employee census in our template and we test it for completeness. | OUTPUT: Cleaned data file and a log of exceptions. |
| >>> | ||
| Step 3: Assumption Setting |
We set the discount rate, pay growth, leaver rates and mortality for SAR-denominated obligations. | OUTPUT: Memo listing each assumption, its source and its range. |
| >>> | ||
| Step 4: Calculation and Draft |
Prima's software runs the model, a second actuary checks it, and a draft comes to you. | OUTPUT: Draft report and notes for your comments. |
| >>> | ||
| Step 5: Final Report and Fieldwork Support |
We finalise after your feedback and stay with the audit team through fieldwork. | OUTPUT: Signed report, disclosure pack and answers to auditor queries. |
Entities where benefit disclosures face both audit and regulatory reading.
Multi-site workforces with long service histories and service awards.
Long-tenure employees and material post-employment obligations.
Benefit valuations that sit alongside your wider actuarial reporting, prepared by actuaries who also work on IFRS 17 for insurance contracts.
Clinical and administrative staff whose salary paths differ, so one assumption set would misstate the liability.
Fast hiring, where the old provision method cannot keep up and lenders want IFRS figures.
High headcount and high turnover, where the turnover assumption moves the EOSB liability materially.
Seasonal hiring at scale, so census cleaning decides accuracy.
An unsupported provision rarely stays quiet. By the next audit the gap surfaces as an adjustment, restated comparatives or a qualified opinion, all visible to lenders and boards.
Indirect costs add up. Fieldwork drags, finance staff rebuild workbooks against the clock, and management spends time defending a figure instead of running the business. Groups with a parent abroad can also miss consolidation dates. A signed valuation in the file before fieldwork starts removes most of that friction.
So treat the valuation as part of reporting infrastructure, not an administrative task. Our note on how our audit-ready reports are produced shows what a defensible file contains. Teams that book early also keep time to discuss assumptions with the auditor.
Share the list of entities and the benefit types you run. We reply with a scoped quote and a firm timetable, usually within one business day.
Usually not. Article 84 of the Saudi Labor Law sets the exit payment by a fixed formula, and Article 85 scales it for resigning employees by years of service (Ministry of Human Resources guidance on the end-of-service award). IAS 19 instead requires a projected, discounted measurement using actuarial assumptions, so a provision equal to the statutory figure will draw an auditor question.
Publicly accountable entities must use IFRS Standards as endorsed by SOCPA, and IAS 19 is part of that set. SMEs apply the IFRS for SMEs Standard as endorsed, which has its own employee benefits section, unless they elect full IFRS. The size of the liability decides whether a full valuation is needed.
Yes. One methodology and one report template can be applied to every Saudi entity in the group, with a consolidated summary on top. That keeps assumptions consistent and gives the group auditor a single method document.
It lists the entities, benefit types, reporting date, deliverables and timetable before work starts. Data files can be supplied with English or Arabic labels, and amounts are valued in SAR.
Allow two to three weeks for one entity when the data is complete. Groups follow the schedule in the scope letter, and tight audit dates can be fast-tracked with Prima's software.
IAS 19 paragraph 83 sets the rate by reference to market yields on high quality corporate bonds in the obligation's currency and term. Where that corporate bond market is not deep, government bond yields in that currency are used instead. The actuary documents the choice source by source, with sensitivity.
You receive the DBO, service cost, interest cost, OCI remeasurements, draft notes and an assumptions memo, packaged for the audit team. Sensitivity tables come as standard.
A census listing date of birth, joining date, salary components and benefit entitlement for each covered employee. Prima supplies a template and tests the file on receipt. Payroll extracts usually cover it, and many teams finish in an afternoon.
An auditor that helps produce an estimate then has to audit it, which creates a self-review problem. A separate valuation firm hands the audit team something to test, not something to defend.
It is the technique IAS 19 prescribes for defined benefit schemes. Service in each year builds one unit of entitlement, and the projected value of all units is discounted to the reporting date.
Yes. Contributions are expensed as they fall due and no actuarial valuation is needed. Actuarial work is reserved for defined benefit arrangements such as end of service schemes.
Yes, where a scheme qualifies as an other long-term benefit, such as a long-service award, the same census can support it. The scope letter confirms which benefits are included.
HR supplies and confirms the employee census, and finance approves the assumptions and signs the disclosures. The assumptions memo lists each input and its source, so the audit team can trace every figure.
Check five things: a credentialed actuary who signs the report, working knowledge of the Saudi Labor Law end-of-service articles (84 to 88), a second-actuary review, direct access for your auditor, and a data-handling policy for payroll files. Ask to see a sample assumptions memo before you appoint. Prefer the provider whose output your auditor can test without rework.
An IAS 19 file often touches other standards. These sit with the same Prima team:
An unsupported end of service provision costs more each year it stays on the books: extra audit time, adjustment risk and a figure no one can defend. A signed IAS 19 valuation replaces that with a scoped fee and a firm timetable. Prima Consulting prepares end of service benefits valuations in Saudi Arabia for single companies and groups, and the global IAS 19 valuation service covers wider reporting needs.
30-minute call. No obligation. Scope confirmed in writing before any work begins. Also available: the IAS 19 Data Checklist.
Use the form to tell our team about your Saudi entities and reporting dates, and we will reply with next steps.
We schedule a call at a time that suits you
We hold a discovery meeting on your needs
We send a proposal
